🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an event that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a corporate feel, growing to encompass functions where African descendants are compensated to speak with white audiences about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The wave has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Month

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in the second month, but also in October in the UK, Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has transformed since those days, focusing less on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the month is celebrated is a indication of the current political situation. How it develops is a valuable example in how co-option leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels empowered to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a source of worry. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in the European continent as a entirety.

In the United States, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, often successfully, to the highest courts of the country. A campaign to remove African American heritage and narrative from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the former president's initial presidential directives focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration symbolises how little it can be effective if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the conditions of the current era. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. An academic expert, a professor at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just do away with things like Black History Month entirely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an time that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an foundation that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed through the year (as some institutions are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not avoid political issues, and leaves space for citizens, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What value has mere awareness of the bygone era when it ignores the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Establishments who mark it should not be reassured with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the threats that face all if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and responsive. Perhaps an complete renaming is required – Black History is Now Month.